Bring your idea
Bring what you’re working on. A simulated version of them responds using their recorded reasoning, with citations for the views behind it. Explore how it applies to your situation.
You
We have two pilot customers, and support is taking up half my week. Should I hire someone or fix the product first?
From the record
An answer starts with the founder’s recorded reasoning, tied to the passages it draws on. The citation takes you to the original recording and timestamp.
Applied to you
Try sorting a week of requests into product gaps and hands-on help. That could tell you what a hire would actually solve. Are both pilot customers getting stuck in the same place?
Illustrative dialogue and citation format. This hypothetical application is not a real person’s quote, advice or endorsement.
Use cases
Bring a real question. Explore the public record, compare perspectives, and decide what applies to you.
01Make a decision
Working through a launch, a pricing change, or an early hire? Explore the trade-offs through a founder’s recorded reasoning and apply them to your situation.
Try asking
“We’re choosing between a niche launch and a broad one. What assumptions should we test?”
02Build an idea
Bring a rough product idea or a plan that feels unfinished. Use the conversation to examine your assumptions, explain the customer, and sharpen the next step.
Try asking
“Here’s my product idea. Where is the weakest part of the customer story?”
03Follow the evidence
Explore what someone said about a topic across public talks and interviews. Follow timestamped citations to hear the context and check the reasoning for yourself.
Try asking
“What did they say about hiring early teams, and where can I hear it?”
04Compare perspectives
Bring multiple compiled perspectives into a group conversation. Explore where their recorded views overlap and where they lead to different ways of approaching your question.
Try asking
“Where do these perspectives agree, and what trade-offs do they weigh differently?”
Group chats
You don’t have to keep every conversation one-to-one. Bring multiple compiled profiles into the same chat, compare their reasoning, and keep the follow-ups in one shared thread.
Each participant is a labelled AI simulation grounded in that person’s public recordings.
Your question, explored together
2–6 perspectivesPick 2–6 people with compiled profiles. Name the group around the question you want to explore.
Put a question to the group, then direct a follow-up to a particular participant when you want to go deeper.
Invite another perspective to respond to a specific contribution. Check the source citations behind recorded views and see where the reasoning differs.
The difference
You have a decision to make, a plan to test, or an idea you cannot stop thinking about. Start there. Ask the follow-up, push back, and explain what makes your situation different.
Timbre looks for relevant passages in a person’s public recordings. A labelled AI simulation reasons from those passages to help you explore your own question, with the documented views and hypothetical applications kept distinct.
Answers describe the person’s recorded views and cite the passages they use. They cannot speak for the person or fill gaps in the public record.
What it draws on
Talks
transcript
Podcasts
transcript
Interviews
transcript
Public Q&A
transcript
Built around your question
Start with what you are working on: a pricing call, a hire, a pivot. Ask the question you came with, in your own words.
A labelled simulation works from their recorded views and applies them to your situation. Generated dialogue is not a quote. Where the record runs out, it says so.
Claims about recorded views link to the original recording and the second. Hear the context, check the reasoning, and decide what applies to you.
Already compiled
The library preview is temporarily unavailable.
Public sources only, every claim cited, and any person can ask to be removed. Read exactly what we will and will not do first.